The LA Story - October 24, 2015

john's picture

If you live in Los Angeles, and you don't live in a cave, you've probably seen this story about an earthquake forecast for the Los Angeles area.  The controversial piece of the story is basically that the 99.9% probability computed by the methods on this web site is higher than the quoted probability of 85% probability computed by the US Geological Survey.  Both of these probabilities are for a circular region of radius 100 km around La Habra, California, over the time period of 3 years from about June 2015 to June 2018.  The 99.9% probability was computed for a paper published in Earth and Space Science, a peer reviewed journal of the American Geophysical Union.  The paper appeared online this past week. 

Although these two probability calculations seem similar, they are based on very different methods.  The USGS probability is based on a pretty massive model of interacting earthquake faults combined with "expert opinion".  Their model solves for about 250,000 potential ruptures constrained by about 37,000 data (as per their method), thus the model is underconstrained. 

More importantly, their probability of 85% is a time-independent probability, rather than being the type of time-dependent probability used on this web site.  Lucy Jones of the US Geological Survey has explained the differences this way:

"Jones said the NASA-led study uses a method that predicts higher numbers of strong earthquakes in the future because fewer than expected have struck in the past.  That’s very different from the USGS model, which says the probability of an earthquake doesn’t vary from one year to the next."

To emphasize this latter point, we use the hazard viewer to compute two 1-year forecasts for the same circular region, using the Forecast Timeseries tool on the Hazard Viewer.  The top figure is for an M>5 earthquake within the region, and the bottom figure is for a M>6 earthquake within the region.   It is clear from looking at the figures that the time-averaged probability for M> 5 events over the past 7 years is about 55%, even though the current probability for the next year is about 62%.  For M>6 earthquakes, the current forward-looking 1 year probability is 4.7%, lower than the average value of 5.5%. 

The same general conclusions will be true of the 3-year probabilities, meaning that the time-averaged probability for 3-years is probably closer to 90% than the current value of 99.9%.

The fact that earthquake probabilities are time-dependent is a concept taught in all introductory geology classes at the university level, so it should come as no surprise that time-dependent values of probability can differ from time-independent values.

Figure above is for M>5 earthquakes within a 100 km circle at right, for the 3 years from June 2015 to June 2018.

 

Figure above is for M>6 earthquakes within a 100 km circle at right, for the 3 years from June 2015 to June 2018.

Comments

DavidAlexander's picture

Both the theories proved to be at their best in predicting the earthquake which gives minutes to evacuate before the earth quakes! I’m ready to do my physics homework on studying the demography which deals with earthquake study. But I need to complete my graduation before actually entering into this!

umam12's picture
umam12's picture
Nodami's picture

<p>I am so thankful for the time you took to help with my project in &lt;a href="<a href="http://anibargh.com/%d8%a8%d8%b1%d9%82%da%a9%d8%a7%d8%b1/"><strong>http:...برقکار/</strong></a>"&gt;برقکار&lt;/a&gt;. It was so nice of you to help me out the other day at &lt;a href="<a href="http://www.techmpd.com/%d8%b1%d9%86%da%af-%d9%87%d8%a7%db%8c-%d8%aa%d8%b...رنگ-های-ترافیکی/</strong></a>"&gt;رنگ-های-ترافیکی&lt;/a&gt;. We will always be grateful for all that you have done to help us in the &lt;a href="http://drbehjoo.ir/پروتز"&gt;پروتز&lt;/a&gt;. I will always remember how you helped me to get this wonderful opportunity. We are forever in your debt for helping us through this tough time.</p>

maneli's picture



I will always remember how you helped me to get this wonderful opportunity طراحی نما

hernald's picture

Download mod apkGames and modded apps here at apkreal.com for Free. mod apk for android

sitakdesign's picture

I will always remember how you helped me to get this wonderful opportunity بازسازی ساختمان

elamoxon's picture

To emphasize this latter point, we use the hazard viewer to compute two 1-year forecasts for the same circular region, using the Forecast Timeseries tool on the Hazard Viewer. Have a look at Himalayas Tour

 
MorganFowler's picture

Both the theories proved to be at their pleasant in predicting the earthquake which offers minutes to evacuate before the earth quakes! I’m equipped to do my physics homework on reading the demography which offers with earthquake take a look at. Get our Best Essay Writers UK to ease your burdens!

lucca728's picture

Thank you for your sharing.  viinipullon korkki , korkrolle

sammori's picture

khgfe the hazard viewer to compute two 1-year forecasts for the same circular region, using the Forecast Timeseries tool on the Hazard Viewer.  The top figure is for an M>5 earthquake within the region, and the bottom figure is for a M>6  best open buffet near me  earthquake within the region.   It is clear from looking at the figures that the time-averaged probability for M> 5 events over the past

Celina's picture

Nice post. Keep up the great work. Just shared this with my friends. Voyance par téléphone.

Risk Alert